my Father’s Mother’s Father’s Father and Mother

Jenny MacKay nee Cripps > Charles Cripps > Norma Cripps nee Lymburner > Charles Lymburner > Adam Lymburner Lymburner & Elizabeth Jeffs

You know how some couples just stay put their whole lives? Not my two-times-great-grandparents. Adam Lymburner Lymburner and Elizabeth Jeffs spent their entire marriage jumping over boundaries, social class, continents, you name it, making choices that kept pushing them into completely new territory.

Leaving London in a hurry

London, May 1848, the last month of spring. There’s political drama happening across Europe, rumours about gold discoveries floating around from the colonies, and there’s this bloke with two surnames standing in a church in Pimlico marrying Elizabeth Jeffs, whose father William is listed on the marriage certificate as a “Gentleman”.

But this is where things get really complicated. Adam had come from a comfortable medical family in Brunswick Square, got educated at King’s College and furthered his education abroad in Florence, Italy. He had already been ordered by royal licence to dump the surname “Delisser,” the surname on his baptismal certificate and take “Lymburner” instead. All to secure an inheritance from his great-uncle. By May 1848, he was 24 years old and caught between two women.

Elizabeth Jeffs had been working as a lady’s maid for the Delisser family. She’d actually been the principal witness at the inquest when Adam’s sister Adelaide died tragically in 1845, falling from a second-storey window. By January 1847, Elizabeth had borne Adam a daughter, Agnes—their first child, born out of wedlock. But, at the same time, Adam was also involved with another woman, Mary James Vice, who by May 1848 was six months pregnant with his son.

The timeline tells you everything about the pressure Adam was under. On May 23, 1848, he applied for a special licence to marry Elizabeth. Two days later, on May 25, the Royal George departed London via Plymouth, bound for Port Adelaide, with “Mr and Mrs A. Lymburner and child” listed on the passenger manifest, even though they weren’t yet married. Two days after that, on May 27, Adam and Elizabeth finally wed at St Peter’s, Pimlico, while the ship was still making its way to Plymouth.

Adam had made his choice. He was leaving England with Elizabeth and their daughter Agnes, abandoning Mary James Vice, who would give birth to their son, also named Adam, on August 12, 1848, while the Royal George was somewhere in the middle of the ocean. Whether Mary ever told him about the birth, or whether he ever knew he’d left a son behind in London, we can’t say for certain.

For Elizabeth, agreeing to that voyage meant swapping familiar streets for a cramped cabin and months on the open ocean. But it also meant escaping the scandal of an illegitimate child and the precarious position of being an unmarried mother in Victorian London. The colonies offered her something London never could, a fresh start where no one knew their history, where she could be Mrs Lymburner without whispers following her down the street.

Choosing the edge of settlement

By September 1848 they’d stepped ashore at Port Adelaide, and straight away you can see them choosing to live at the edge of things. Adam took a roomy house in Kermode Street, North Adelaide. The place was advertised with ‘immediate possession’ and ‘seven rooms’. Rather ambitious, but then he did receive a princely sum from his inheritance.

He threw himself into schemes like the Forest Iron and Sawing Company on Cox’s Creek, joining up with a provisional committee of speculators and merchants. That decision pulled the family toward the timbered hills rather than settling into the safe, established town life.

Elizabeth’s choices are harder to track in the records, but they’re just as dramatic. The kids arrived in quick succession. Adelaide in 1849, Edmund and others soon after. Each birth location marks another move: Para Plains, then Hope Farm at Meadows, then Dashwood’s Gully in the Kondoparinga district. Agreeing to those moves meant raising a large family on farms and bush blocks, a world away from her London parish, in a landscape that could burn, fail, or flourish without any warning.

Working with risk and loss

Over at Para Plains, Adam let himself be sworn in as a farmer-juror, staking his reputation on being part of the colony’s civic backbone as well as its more speculative fringe. But farming didn’t come easily for them. One little son named Edmund died in infancy, drowning in a waterhole just yards from their Para Plains homestead despite Elizabeth and their daughter Agnes’ desperate attempts to save him, and later another son born at Elliston got the same name, a pattern that quietly shows how they handled loss. They repeated, they didn’t retreat.

The newspaper snippets place Adam in court cases, in quarrels involving “threatening language”, and in public notices about lost gold receipts. All of this suggests a bloke willing to operate where money, honour, and temper were under serious pressure.

Then the weather added its own demands. In March 1868, bushfires swept around Meadows, and the report notes that “Mr A. L. Lymburner... will be considerable sufferers”—meaning fences and improvements at Dashwood’s Gully went up in smoke. Instead of leaving the district immediately, Adam actually accepted election as a district councillor for Kondoparinga later that year. He chose public responsibility over running away, right when his own property had just been devastated.

Staying, while others left

By 1870, the family’s choices shifted again. A report from Meadows mentions the “Meadows Young Men’s Association” raising funds, with recitations by Edmund, Ellis, and Archie Lymburner, and notes that the piece they performed was written by “Mr A. Lymburner, of Hope Farm, Dashwood’s Gully”. That tiny detail hints at evenings of drafting verses by lamplight, sons learning their lines in a crowded farmhouse, and Elizabeth keeping the household running so her husband could indulge his literary side even after failed farming ventures and fires.

When a local paper later announced that “another old and respected resident is about to leave the District—Mr A. L. Lymburner, Assayer, of Hope Farm, Dashwood Gully”, it framed his departure as part of a wider exodus to Moonta and other mining centres. But Adam and Elizabeth didn’t just chase the latest rush. His path took him even further, eventually to Gympie in Queensland, where he set up as an analytical chemist and assayer. And she followed, leaving behind yet another network of neighbours and graves in the South Australian hills. In a world where most women’s lives narrowed with age, Elizabeth kept choosing to pack up, start again, and remake “home” somewhere completely new.

Making a life out of change

Gympie gave them a different stage. Adam’s obituary credited him as the first person in Queensland to put chlorination into practical use for gold ores, and praised the analytical chemist who’d once tried farming “without success”. He served as secretary to the Cemetery Trust from the early 1880s until his death at the end of 1893, a role his daughter Adelaide then inherited, suggesting a family decision to anchor themselves by looking after the place where their stories ended.

Elizabeth died in Gympie in 1886 after 38 years of marriage. Her death notice quietly closed the circle that began in a Pimlico church and ran through shipboard cabins, drought-prone paddocks, smoke-hazed gullies, and mining towns.

The pattern in the choices

None of their choices look neat on paper. Some were forced, an inheritance that came with a new name, bushfires that erased years of work, failed crops that pushed Adam back to his scientific training. Others were deliberate: marrying across social lines, leaving London for a colony, staying in communities after loss, keeping moving toward the next uncertain opportunity rather than retreating to comfort.

Together, those decisions shaped not just their own lives but the path their children and descendants inherited. A path that runs from London to the Two Mile Cemetery at Gympie, tracing the way two people kept stepping into change and calling it home.

Head on over to my WeAre.xyz family history archive to read more about the Lymburner/Delisser/Jeffs family

Sources: The London Gazette; Published by Authority, “Whitehall, February 27, 1836,” March 1836, Number 19361, page 403; digital images, The Gazette (https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/19361/page/403 : accessed 14 Jan 2017).

London Metropolitan Archives; London, England, UK; London Church of England Parish Registers; Reference Number: P90/PAN1/014

Newspaper, The South Australian, Tuesday, 19 September 1848, page 2

Newspaper, Adelaide Times, Advertising (1848, December 11). Adelaide Times (SA : 1848 - 1858), p. 3.

Newspaper, Adelaide Observer (SA: 1843-1904), COUNTRY LETTERS. (1868, March 14). Adelaide Observer (SA : 1843 - 1904), p. 5. Retrieved August 2, 2024, from http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article158929819

Newspaper, Gympie times and Mary River Mining Gazette, Notes and News. (1894, February 1). Gympie Times and Mary River Mining Gazette (Qld. : 1868 - 1919), p. 3.

Literally. They’ve lived in my filing cabinet—a physical one, tucked away with all my other genealogy research that had not been digitised. Photocopies from the Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec in Montreal, obtained back when I was visiting distant relatives in 2002. These were French legal documents from the early 1800s. Notarial records. Court petitions. Guardian appointments.

I knew they were important; they were about my great-great-great-grandmother, Deborah Crawford. As we often find with genealogy, we tend to get bogged down researching male ancestors, viewing women primarily as bearers of their children. However, I make an effort to uncover more about the women. That old saying about every successful man having a woman behind him? Still true!

But honestly? I’d only ever managed to extract the bare bones: names, dates, the fact that she was orphaned young. The dense legal French, the archaic terminology, the complex interconnections between documents—it all just sat there, keeping its secrets.

Until now.

With the help of AI, I’ve finally coaxed these documents into telling me Deborah’s full story. And what a story it is.

Just to clarify one small note re this video where they mention Deborah Delisser nee Crawfords two children dying within hours of each other. They in fact died 4 days apart. Everything else in the video is spot on. AI NotebookLM did a brilliant job.

The Documents That Waited

Let me paint you a picture of what I had: baptism records, marriage contracts, guardianship petitions, estate renunciations, partnership agreements, burial records. Most in nineteenth-century legal French. All precisely documented in that meticulous way that notaries worked, but without any narrative thread to tie them together.

My Quebec relatives had transcribed them for me, but I still didn’t understand the legal jargon. I knew Deborah was born on 30 December 1796 in Quebec. I knew her parents were John Crawford, a merchant, and Deborah Cox. I knew they both died in 1803, leaving her and her siblings orphaned. I’d even found the double wedding record from 1823—Deborah and her sister Agnes both married on the same day at St Pancras Old Church in London.

But I didn’t understand the why of any of it. Why were these children orphaned with seemingly wealthy merchant parents? What happened to the business? Who were all these guardians? How did four orphaned children from Quebec end up marrying in London twenty years later?

The documents held the answers. I just couldn’t read them properly.

Enter AI: A Research Assistant Like No Other

This year, I decided to throw everything I had at an AI—Claude, specifically. Not just asking it to translate, but to analyse. To piece together the puzzle.

(Did you know Claude could translate French into English?)

I uploaded document after document. The partnership agreements from 1795. The guardianship petitions from 1803 and 1811. The death records. The inheritance renunciation from 1804. Even a newspaper clipping from Edinburgh that I’d found about her grandmother’s death.

And slowly, document by document, the story emerged.

Deborah’s Story: From Privilege to Orphanhood

Here’s what I learned:

Little Deborah Crawford was born into what should have been privilege. Her father John was a successful merchant in Quebec, partner with his maternal uncle Mathew Lymburner in a thriving business. They owned wharves, warehouses, properties along the Quebec waterfront. Her mother was Deborah Cox, daughter of Nicholas Cox, who’d been Lieutenant Governor of Gaspé.

But tragedy struck swiftly.

On 22 March 1803, when Deborah was just six years old, her mother died. She was only 26. Deborah’s father was left with four young children: Deborah (6), John Lymburner (4), Agnes Dickie (2), and baby William Nicholas, who was only six months old.

Seven months later—seven months—their father died too. Seventeen October 1803. Deborah had just turned seven.

Four orphans.

The Devastating Truth in the Documents

These children inherited nothing.

Not because their father was poor. But because of how the business partnership was structured.

You see, the documents showed that all those properties, all those wharves and warehouses? They were registered solely in Mathew Lymburner’s name. There were partnership agreements—three of them, actually, dated 31 January 1795, 2 February 1795, and 21 September 1795—that were supposed to protect John Crawford’s interests. But when he died, the business had more debts than assets.

On 9 March 1804, just months after becoming orphans, the children’s guardian had to petition the court to renounce their inheritance. Not because there was nothing, but because accepting it would have meant inheriting their father’s business debts.

Four children, aged 7, 5, 3, and 1. Protected from debt, but left with nothing.

The People Who Stepped Up

Their first guardian was George Longmore, a physician in His Majesty’s Service. The AI helped me understand something crucial: he wasn’t just a family friend. He was married to Christiana Letitia Cox—Deborah’s aunt, her mother’s sister. He was family. And he served as their guardian for eight years, until his death in August 1811.

Then came John Jones, described in the records as a “gentleman,” who took over as guardian for the next ten years. And throughout it all—for the entire eighteen years from 1803 to 1821—a merchant named Robert Woolsey served as “Surrogate Tutor,” providing continuity through all the changes.

These men weren’t obligated to do this. But they did.

The Edinburgh Connection

One of the most stunning discoveries came from a simple newspaper clipping. The AI helped me connect a death notice from the Caledonian Mercury dated 28 October 1815 to my family.

“At her daughter Mrs Longmore’s house, 18 Gayfield Square, on the 17th instant, Mrs Deborah Cox, relict of the late Colonel Cox, much and justly regretted.”

Deborah’s grandmother hadn’t died in Quebec. She was living in Edinburgh, Scotland. At her daughter Christiana’s house—the same Christiana who was married to George Longmore, the children’s first guardian.

This explained so much. Why couldn’t grandmother take in the orphaned children in 1803? Because she was 3,000 miles away in Scotland. But it also showed that there was family in Britain. Connections that would later help these children make their way across the Atlantic.

The Turning Point: 1821

In June 1821, the children’s uncle—William Crawford, their father’s brother who’d been Provincial Judge for the Inferior District of Gaspé—died intestate in New Brunswick.

The documents show that in October 1821, John Lymburner Crawford, now 22 and living in Montreal, petitioned to become guardian to his younger siblings. He identified himself and his siblings as “sole heirs” to their uncle’s estate.

Finally, an inheritance. Finally, financial independence.

And within two years, all four siblings had made their way to Britain.

A Double Wedding in London

On 2 August 1823, at St Pancras Old Church in London, two sisters married on the same day.

Deborah Crawford, age 26, married Alexander Delisser, a physician with an MD. Her sister Agnes, age 22, married Samuel James Douglas.

Imagine that day. Two orphaned girls from Quebec, who’d lost their parents twenty years earlier, who’d been raised by a succession of guardians, now standing together in a London church. Were their brothers there too? Did they think of their parents? Of the grandmother who’d died in Edinburgh eight years earlier? Of Uncle George Longmore who’d cared for them?

The documents don’t tell me. But knowing what I know now, I can imagine.

I do know that their father’s uncle, Adam Lymburner was there. He witnessed both their marriages and he played a big part in their future. To learn more about his role in their future, visit my family history archive at JenealogyScrapbook

What Twenty Years and AI Taught Me

For two decades, I had the pieces of this puzzle. But I couldn’t see the picture.

What AI gave me wasn’t just translation—though that helped enormously with the dense legal French. It was analysis. Connection-making. The ability to say “this document from 1795 explains what happened in 1804” and “this guardianship arrangement connects to that family relationship” and “here’s why these children couldn’t inherit even though their father was a merchant.”

AI helped me understand the why behind the what.

I learned that Deborah’s maternal grandfather, Nicholas Cox, had been a British Army officer who served in the French and Indian War, fought at the Siege of Quebec, and became Lieutenant Governor of Gaspé. That adds context to her mother’s family status.

I learned that her father’s business partner, Mathew Lymburner, couldn’t help the Crawford orphans because he was secretly supporting his own two illegitimate children—revealed in a document from July 1821 where he donated land to them. That explains so much about why the children had to make their own way.

I learned that there’s still a mystery about how these children got from Quebec to Britain between 1821 and 1823—no passenger lists found yet. That’s my next research challenge.

The Documents Still Speak

Those same documents that sat silent in my filing cabinet for twenty years are now the richest source I have. Not because they’ve changed, but because I finally have a tool that can help me truly read them.

Every genealogist knows the frustration of having documents you can’t fully interpret. Language barriers, legal jargon, handwriting challenges, missing context. We do our best. We transcribe what we can. We make notes. We move on to other research.

But sometimes, with the right help, we can come back, dig deeper and finally hear our ancestors’ voices.

I knew the bare facts about Deborah for twenty years. But now I know her story. And that changes everything.

If you’re sitting on old research documents that you’ve never fully understood, I encourage you to revisit them with fresh eyes—and perhaps with new tools. Our ancestors’ stories are worth the wait.

However, after three decades of writing Alexander’s name down, searching for his birth place and his parents, I kept hitting one brick wall after another. That trail went cold, so I shelved the research and concentrated on the son who changed his name. (See links below regarding that story).

When my Ancestry DNA results came back showing 2% Ashkenazi Jewish heritage, I didn’t think too much of it. 2% isn’t a lot… or is it? But when a couple of close relatives tested and their results showed not only Ashkenazi but Sephardic Jewish heritage too, I started to pay attention.

For context, Ashkenazi Jews trace their roots to Central and Eastern Europe, while Sephardic Jews came from Spain and Portugal. During the Inquisition many Sephardic families fled, some to Amsterdam, some to London, and from there on to places like the Caribbean. That’s how our Delissers ended up in Jamaica.

I realised I’d been so focused on the Lymburner side, the name change, the inheritance, the move to Australia, that I’d never really asked who the Delissers were.

And at the centre of this puzzle sat my 3x great grandfather, Alexander Delisser.

I knew he had marched his son off to have his name changed when Adam was only twelve years old and I knew he had moved to Italy and died there several years later. I also knew that two of his teenage children tragically died soon after, back in London, four days apart and their bodies exhumed and taken to Florence, to be buried with their father.

Then the trail went cold. I didn’t know why the family went to Florence, nor when and I really didn’t know who Alexander’s parents were. Without trapsing across the globe to Italy or London, I genuinly thought I’d found everything I could about him. I’d searched the usual databases, combed through what records I could access, and pieced together what felt like the most complete picture possible. Although, Alexander’s story remained frustatingly incomplete.

Then FamilySearch introduced their Full Text search function, and everything changed.

For those unfamiliar with it, Full Text search uses AI to recognise old handwriting and makes the actual text within historical documents searchable. Instead of relying on someone to have indexed a name, you can now search for words buried deep within parish registers, wills, vestry minutes, documents that might mention your ancestor in the middle of a paragraph rather than in a neat, indexed list. It’s revolutionary to say the least!

Suddenly, I wasn’t just finding indexed names and dates. I was reading actual documents, actual words written about Alexander and his family. The uncle’s will appeared first, formal legal language that finally documented who Alexander’s father was. Uncle Ellis Delisser, you are a gem! You listed all the children of your brother Aaron and named each and every one of them.

Here’s what I realised: I didn’t need a baptism or birth certificate. Don’t get me wrong, those would’ve been brilliant for pinning down exact dates, but just knowing who his father was? That single fact was enough. It transformed thirty years of uncertainty into confirmed family relationships and connected our family to the Sepharidic Jewish community not only in London, but in Jamaica as well. The speculation could finally stop.

But, then, another revelation came from the St Pancras parish vestry minutes.

These were just everyday administrative records of parish business, but they contained so much more. Within those mundane entries, FamilySearch’s Full Text search revealed the why and when of Alexander’s move to Italy. The pieces that had seemed so disconnected suddenly formed a complete, coherent picture. The uncle’s will and the vestry minutes together showed me Alexander’s movements weren’t mysterious at all, they made perfect sense once I understood the family circumstances driving his decisions.

After three decades of knowing my 3x great grandfather’s name but being unable to push past that generation, a new search tool finally broke through the barrier.

This is what keeps me returning to this work, what keeps me up at night and a reminder that we’re never truly finished. Just when you think you’ve exhausted every avenue, a freshly digitised collection or a new search function opens up entirely new chapters of the story. Alexander Delisser went from a figure shrouded in speculation to someone whose movements, motivations, and family connections I can now trace with confidence.

Although the DNA puzzle remains, that curious 2% Ashkenazi against a backdrop of Sephardic heritage still sits there, unexplained. But at least now I’ve got Alexander’s Italian sojourn sorted. Sometimes the answers aren’t where we first look for them. And sometimes, the tools we need to find those answers haven’t even been built yet when we start searching.

As I always say, never give up, one day those brick walls will come tumbling down.

Read more about Alexander Delisser and the Delisser/Lymburner history over on my family history archive at WeAre .xyz

Read Alexander Delisser’s story here

Why Adam Lymburner Delisser changed his name

For more Delisser Family History - select the link and a name on the tree to read more of this fascinating piece of our history.

Leave a comment

Sources and Further Reading

• British Genealogy Forum - Delisser Family Discussion: https://www.british-genealogy.com/forum/threads/73927-Delisser

• History of the Jews in Jamaica (Wikipedia): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Jamaica

• The History of Surgery and Surgical Training in the UK (PubMed Central): https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8377927/

• The Sculptors Associated with Florence’s ‘English’ Cemetery: https://www.florin.ms/sculptors.html

• Grand Tour (Wikipedia): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Tour

• English Cemetery, Florence (Wikipedia): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Cemetery,_Florence

• Edmund Alexander Delisser - WikiTree: https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Delisser-29

• E. A. Delisser (Wikipedia): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._A._Delisser

The message was brief: I think your Adam was taken in by his grandparents. He shows up later as Henry Hocken.

That single line took me by surprise and it had me scurrying back to my research that I'd been doing on and off for over a decade. Adam Lymburner, the baby who later used the name Henry Hocken, is my great-grandfather Charles Harry Norman Lymburner's half-brother. They share a father, Adam Lymburner Lymburner, who is my 2× great-grandfather. So Adam/Henry is my half great-granduncle. Close enough to matter, mysterious enough to keep me hooked.

I opened a fresh page of notes and started, all over again! However, this time I’m using my ever faithful side-kick AI in the form of ChatGPT, Perplexity and Claude, to help me unravel this mystery and make sense of all the documents I was collecting. They were beginning to do my head in!

What did happened to baby Adam/Henry?

A Complicated Beginning

On 12 August 1848 in High Laver, Essex, a baby was registered as Adam Lymburner. His mother, Mary James Vice, signed the birth certificate herself. The father named was Adam Lymburner Lymburner, described as an ‘independent gentleman.’ The birth appears to be double-indexed in the General Register Office under both Lymburner and Vice. Is this a bureaucratic hiccup that hints at the complicated circumstances surrounding this child's arrival?

This is my dilemma—Adam Senior, the baby’s father, had already committed to departing for Australia with Elizabeth Jeffs and their baby daughter, Agnes. The Royal George sailed on 25 May 1848, but Adam and Elizabeth didn't marry until 27 May at St. Peter's, Pimlico. This timeline raises questions about how they managed to coordinate their wedding with their passage to Australia. Did they meet the ship in London, disembark briefly to marry, and then reunite before it left Plymouth on 1 June? The special marriage license obtained on 23 May suggests urgent timing. By the time little Adam was born in Essex, his father was three months into an ocean voyage, having hastily legitimised his departure.

Adam jnr arrived into a tangle: absent father, unmarried mother, and a family that would wrap itself around his very existence.

The Surname That Tells on Itself

Mary James Vice's mother also named Mary nee James, had been widowed young when her husband John Vice, a tailor, died in 1833 at just 38 years old. In 1836, she married James Hocken, also a tailor. Later, she would marry again, becoming Mrs Benjamin Sambell. The names Vice, Hocken and Sambell turned out to be my map through the records.

In 1851, I find two-year-old Adam in Fulham, West London, with his mother Mary James Vice, living in the household of his step-grandfather James Hocken, the Master Tailor from Cornwall. The census reveals something crucial: there's a visitor on that page named Benjamin John King, age 27, listed with "No business or profession." This Benjamin King would soon marry Adam's mother, but his presence that day suggests the courtship was already underway.

The census shows James Hocken's tailor shop located at the corner of Buckles Alley. Young Adam is recorded as "Adam LYMBURNER, child, 2, born Essex, Matching Green" still using his father's surname and clearly tied to his birth identity.

The Great Disappearing Act

By 1861, Adam isn't with his mother Mary and her new husband Benjamin King in Fulham. The Kings have settled at 1 Hammersmith Gate with their two sons, Benjamin Thomas, age 7, and Walter George, age 1. There's no sign of Mary's first child.

Instead, I find him in Devonport, listed as "Henry Hocken, adopted child, 12, scholar, Essex" in his grandmother Mary's household, who was by then, Mrs Sambell after her third marriage to retired baker Benjamin Sambell. The word "adopted" carries weight here; formal adoption didn't exist in England until 1927, so families simply absorbed children who needed care and recorded the arrangement in whatever language seemed appropriate. The census enumerator wrote "adopted child," but what it really meant was "this boy belongs with us."

And there's the pivot: Adam Lymburner has become Henry Hocken, taking the surname of the step-grandfather who helped raise him in those crucial early years.

The Final Piece of Evidence

Mary James King died of phthisis (tuberculosis) on 1 June 1870 at Roxeth, Harrow, leaving behind her husband Benjamin and their two sons. This tragedy explains the final piece of evidence in Henry's story: the 1871 census shows him as a boarder at the Three Horseshoes Inn on Northolt Road, living with the now-widowed Benjamin J. King, the same Benjamin who had married Henry's mother back in 1853.

Henry Hocken, now aged 22, is surrounded by King family members, including his half-brothers. The birthplace recorded for him is Surrey, Richmond which is clearly incorrect, suggesting either faulty memory or deliberate. But the fact that he’s with his step-family tells the real story: he's still within his mother's household, using the Hocken surname from the grandfather who sheltered him, maintaining connection with the man who became his stepfather.

Once you see this pattern, the name change stops being mysterious. It's a breadcrumb trail from his early beginnings to where James Hocken shaped a boy's identity.

What the Records Reveal

1848 Birth: Adam Lymburner, born 12 August 1848, High Laver, Essex; mother Mary James Vice, single woman; father Adam Lymburner Lymburner, independent gentleman. Birth double-indexed as both Lymburner and Vice.

1851: Living in Fulham with mother Mary James Vice and step-grandparents James and Mary Hocken. Benjamin John King present as visitor, foreshadowing the family's next chapter.

1853: Mother Mary James Vice marries Benjamin John King at St Mary Church, Lewisham. James Hocken serves as witness, cementing the family connections.

1861: Adam, now calling himself Henry Hocken, lives as an "adopted child" with grandmother Mary (now Mrs Sambell) in Devonport.

1870: Mary James King (formerly Vice) dies of phthisis at Roxeth, Harrow, on 1 June 1870, placing the family in Harrow just before the 1871 census.

1871: Henry Hocken boards with widower Benjamin J. King at the Three Horseshoes Inn, Harrow, maintaining family connections while establishing adult independence.

The Threads Still Dangling

After 1871: What became of Henry Hocken? Did he marry, have children, pursue a trade? Did he ever learn the full story of his father's Australian adventures?

The double registration: Why does Adam's birth appear indexed under both surnames? Were there two informants, two addresses, two versions of respectability being negotiated? I am still waiting to hear back from the GRO.

Australian connections: Did Henry ever know he had half-siblings across the ocean? Did Adam Lymburner Lymburner, who became a successful assayer in Queensland, ever wonder about the son he left behind?

Why This Story Matters

Because it shows how ordinary families navigated extraordinary circumstances. Henry's story isn't unique. Victorian England was full of children whose official identities shifted with family fortunes. But each case represents real people making real decisions about belonging, survival, and identity.

The boy who began life as Adam Lymburner and stepped into adulthood as Henry Hocken is no longer a rumor in my family tree. He has rooms, relatives, and reasons. He has a stepfather who kept him close and grandparents who claimed him as their own.

Now I'm after the ending. The marriage records, employment histories, and final census entries that will complete his journey from birth to burial. Because every family story deserves its conclusion.

I will also look at DNA matching. Anyone who has a cM range between 103-284cMs will be my focus on my father’s maternal line.

The email that pulled me back into this research was right: Adam was taken in by his grandparents, and he did show up later as Henry Hocken, the boy who was once Adam Lymburner, found his place in the world by embracing the family that embraced him. In an age when legitimacy was everything, he discovered that belonging was enough.

This is one of those stories that has intrigued me along with what I discovered years ago about my 2x great grandfather and how he came to change his name too. So it’s not new, but it sure makes family research just that tad difficult, but fun at the same time. If it was easy, we wouldn’t get the same enjoyment out of it I’m sure.

Read the story here as to why Adam Lymburner Delisser became Adam Lymburner Lymburner.

This link will take you to a little about my great-grandfather Charles Harry Norman Lymburner.

I gave Adam Lymburner Lymburner a voice to talk about his past when I asked AI to create this overview.

Firstly, a huge thanks to for his idea to use AI to create a genealogical sketch about your ancestor into a memoir. I gave it a try and really liked what it did.

Most family trees are filled with names, dates, and cold facts. But what if you could sit down with your great-great-grandfather and hear his story in his own words?

I recently created a memoir-style conversation with Adam Lymburner, my ancestor who transformed from a London novelist to an Australian mining pioneer. Through his imagined voice, dry genealogical records became deeply human stories of love, loss, regret and reinvention.

The process revealed surprising connections—like how Adam's secret son in England was lovingly raised by his grandmother rather than abandoned. His regrets about his past misdemeanour became a father's lesson about honour and responsibility.

"I want to be remembered as a man who embraced opportunity and wasn't afraid to reinvent himself," Adam reflects in the memoir, speaking across generations about courage and adaptation.

The biggest revelation? Transforming genealogical facts into emotional storytelling creates connections that help us understand not just what happened, but how those experiences shaped the people who came before us.

Every ancestor was once a real person grappling with the same hopes, fears, and mistakes we face today.

Ready to give your ancestors a voice?

Follow this link to read the full memoir conversation and discover how genealogy becomes storytelling when you let your family speak.

Leave a comment

Every family historian dreams of discovering that perfect document—the one that answers all our questions and neatly connects generations. But what happens when those documents contradict each other? When surnames shift and change across time? When your ancestor appears with one name in one record and something completely different in another?

This post is part of my weekly series for the "52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks" challenge. This week's prompt was "Family Secret." I’ve chosen to write about an additional surname that has appeared in my research. Hopefully, by putting it out there, a descendant of Emily Clinch or Stanley Reece, might read it and know the full story.

My 2x great-grandmother's daughter Emily presents exactly this puzzle.

The German Sea Captain & His Australian Bride

In January 1878, 21-year-old Australian born Emily Clinch married a German-born sea captain, Oswald Waldemar Schulze, in Auckland, New Zealand. Their life together would span oceans, bring them to exotic shores, and produce six children.

Emily was born in Sydney around 1860, the daughter of my 2x great-grandmother Anne Green, who had previously married a convict named John Clinch in Tasmania. The family had moved to New South Wales before making their way to New Zealand.

The young couple built a life centred around Oswald's maritime career. As a master mariner, his work took the family to Tonga for several years, where he briefly served as a sub-collector of customs at Tongatabu. Several of their children were born in the Tongan islands before the family eventually returned to Auckland.

The Mystery of the Reece Surname

Here's where our story takes an unexpected turn.

Their youngest son Stanley, born in 1895, would later use the surname "Reece" instead of Schulze. On his military attestation form in 1943, Stanley not only listed his name as "Stanley Nelson Reece," but also claimed that "Reece" was his mother's maiden name—not Clinch.

Why would Stanley claim a completely different surname was his mother's maiden name? Where did "Reece" come from? No other records show Emily using this name.

The timing provides our biggest clue. Stanley's use of the name Reece coincided with World War I, when anti-German sentiment was rampant throughout the British Empire. For a young man with a distinctly German surname like Schulze, adopting a more British-sounding name would have helped him avoid discrimination and suspicion.

Beyond Names: The People Behind the Records

I've explored this story in much greater depth on my blog, including:

• How Emily's mother, Anne Green, transitioned from a convict bride in Tasmania to a respected wife in New Zealand.

• The adventures of Captain Oswald Schulze across the Pacific.

• The story of Stanley's name change and the historical context that may explain his decision.

• Original documents that reveal the contradictions and adaptations in the family's identity.

Continue reading “Tracing the Untraceable" on my WordPress blog →

What naming mysteries have you encountered in your family research? Have you discovered ancestors who changed their names to adapt to new circumstances? Share your stories in the comments!

When Amy Johnson Crow's "52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks" prompt "Surprise" was listed, I initially drew a blank. Then I remembered this story - one that perfectly captures how family history research can surprise us in the most unexpected places.

Picture this: A routine fuel stop in Kangarilla, South Australia. No café in sight, just a small service station. Who would have thought this mundane moment would unlock a treasure trove of family history about my great-great-grandfather, Adam Lymburner?

Born in London as Adam Delisser, he changed his surname at age 12 to inherit a fortune (there's surprise number one!). But the real surprise came when I mentioned his name to the owner of the fuel station. It turned out, he was a passionate local historian with detailed knowledge of my family's history in the area.

This story has all the elements of a great family history novel:

• An inheritance with an unusual condition

• A chance encounter that changed my research journey

• A family's journey from South Australia to Queensland

• And most surprisingly - how a fuel stop helped piece it all together

Want to discover how this chain of serendipitous events unfolded? What did this chance encounter uncover about the Lymburner family's time in South Australia? And what other surprises were waiting to be uncovered?

Read the full story on my Jenealogy Scrapbook blog:

I also have this and more stories on my Family History Archive - Jenealogy Scrapbook at WeAre.xyz

In the harsh landscape of 1860s South Australia, Elizabeth Lymburner faced challenges that would test any mother's strength. Having left behind the familiar cobbled streets of London for the dusty tracks of Adelaide in 1848, she encountered a world where even the most basic necessity - water - could bring both life and heartbreak.

Through careful research of historical records, newspaper accounts, and family documents, I've pieced together the moving story of Elizabeth's life as an early settler. Her story speaks to the incredible determination of colonial women who carved out new lives in an unforgiving land, all while bearing profound personal losses and continuing to nurture hope for the future.

The full article explores Elizabeth's journey from London bride to colonial mother.

Read the complete story on my blog at: Jenealogy Scrapbook

Join me in remembering these remarkable women who helped build our nation, one day at a time.

This weeks prompt for 52 Ancestors in 52 Weeks is - “Overlooked”.

Some ancestors leap off the page with dramatic stories, while others, like my great-great-grandmother Elizabeth Jeffs, lead quieter lives that are often overlooked. Born in 1825 in London, Elizabeth worked as a lady's maid in the Delisser household, where she witnessed both privilege and tragedy, including the shocking death of her employer's daughter in 1845.

Her life took a pivotal turn when she married Adam Lymburner, a man bound by an unusual legacy. To honour the terms of his maternal grand-uncle's will, Adam had to change his name to preserve the Lymburner lineage. Together, Adam and Elizabeth set sail for Australia, embarking on a journey filled with challenges, secrets, and resilience.

From the heartbreak of betrayal to the triumph of raising nine children in a new land, Elizabeth's story is one of quiet strength. It serves as a reminder that history is not only about those who make headlines; it's also about the ordinary people who shape extraordinary legacies.

To read Elizabeth’s full story, follow this link to my blog at JenealogyScrapbook.com

During the Covid-19 lockdowns, I dedicated time to finding out when and how Annie arrived in Australia. Did she swim? It was beginning to seem that way. Then I made an amazing discovery: not only did I have one convict in the family, but I had ‘two’! Actually, make that three! So, I wrote a book and shared it with my family and friends.

Fast forward to 2024, I wanted to turn these fascinating historical pieces into a story that would grab my family and friends' attention. That's where NotebookLM1 came in handy — an AI research assistant that helped me shape Annie's story into a podcast series.

Finding a convict ancestor is like striking genealogy gold - especially when that ancestor is a ten-year-old girl imprisoned for counterfeiting coins with her father. This isn't just any story; this is my great-grandmother Annie's story

2

The story follows Annie Greene, and trust me, her life was anything but boring. At just ten years old, she's thrown in prison with her father for making fake coins. Then her father gets shipped off to Van Diemen's Land (that's Tasmania nowadays), leaving Annie, her mother, and siblings behind in England.

But that's just the beginning. Annie and her sister Matilda ended up in a Tasmanian orphanage after their convicted mother was also sent to Australia.

This podcast is a snippet of what life was really like back then - the poverty, the crimes, the punishments, and how people kept going despite it all. It is based on my self-published book, "In Search of Orphan Annie" where I document everything I was able to find out about Annie's life.

Follow Annie's journey on my blog at jenealogyscrapbook.com and uncover the ups and downs of her incredible life. Sometimes heartbreaking, sometimes inspiring, but always real.

In Search of Orphan Annie by Jenny MacKay is not available for sale. I have created a pdf version, which I used for NotebookLM.

Note: AI can make mistakes. In the AI world, this is called hallucinate. In the podcast, there are some minor hallucinations, but on the whole it has done a great job of pulling the story from my 177 page PDF.

Subscribe now